State legislative leaders are pushing back against a federal judge potentially blocking North Carolina’s photo voter identification law for the upcoming November election. US District Judge Loretta Biggs wrapped up a trial in May regarding a lawsuit challenging the voter ID law, with a decision pending. Republican legislators argue that it would be too late to change the law for the 2024 general election, as absentee voting is set to begin soon. They emphasize that the voter ID law has been in effect for over a year and has been used in multiple elections without issue.
Critics of the voter ID law oppose any potential stay of the ruling against it, arguing that such a move would cause confusion and disenfranchisement of voters in the upcoming election. They question the legality and discriminatory impact of the voter ID requirement. Both sides are citing legal precedent, specifically the “Purcell principle,” which advises against changing election rules close to an election.
The lawsuit against the voter ID law targets several aspects of the legislation, including the ID requirement itself, provisions allowing challenges to voters, and expansion of partisan poll observers. Supporters of the voter ID law argue that it has minimal impact on voters and cite statistics from recent elections to support their claims. The ultimate decision of Judge Biggs could determine whether voter ID remains in place for the November election, with the stakes high for both sides of the debate.
Source
Photo credit www.carolinajournal.com
