Sri Lanka’s upcoming presidential election is set to be a key turning point for the country’s struggling economy. With the IMF imposing austerity measures last year, the election will serve as a referendum on these measures. Incumbent President Ranil Wickremesinghe, one of the frontrunners, has faced criticism for the economic challenges during his tenure. The country’s financial crisis, exacerbated by factors like tax cuts and the COVID-19 pandemic, has led to a balance of payments crisis and a default on external debt. Wickremesinghe’s government turned to the IMF for a bailout, leading to strict austerity measures and debt restructuring.
The other key candidates in the election, Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Sajith Premadasa, have both criticized the IMF deal and proposed alternative economic strategies. Dissanayake, seen as a progressive candidate, has pledged to shift the burden of debt away from ordinary Sri Lankans and onto external creditors. Meanwhile, Premadasa has focused on boosting export markets and enhancing the rule of law. Both candidates offer alternatives to the current economic trajectory under Wickremesinghe’s leadership.
Despite some signs of improvement, including a stabilizing currency and lower inflation, Sri Lanka still faces significant economic challenges. High debt levels, low tax revenue, and a dependence on imports continue to hinder the country’s recovery. Economists suggest that the next president should focus on renegotiating the IMF deal, introducing a wealth tax, and investing in domestic industries to strengthen the economy and avoid future defaults. The election outcome will have far-reaching implications for Sri Lanka’s economic future.
Source
Photo credit www.aljazeera.com