As Americans shift their focus from Thanksgiving to Christmas, the choice between a real or artificial Christmas tree presents an environmental dilemma. While data shows that most households prefer artificial trees, there are pros and cons to both options. A single artificial tree produces more global warming gases than a real tree, but the comparison changes based on how many years the artificial tree is used. Real trees have the advantage of absorbing carbon dioxide while growing and providing habitat for wildlife, but their disposal method matters. Mulching is the most ecologically beneficial way to dispose of a real Christmas tree.
Artificial trees are typically made from petroleum-derived plastic transported thousands of miles from China, adding to their carbon cost. However, if used for at least five years, the environmental impact of an artificial tree becomes equivalent to that of a real tree. Purchasing a second-hand artificial tree and replacing lights with low-energy LEDs can further reduce its carbon footprint by keeping it out of landfills.
In conclusion, the most eco-friendly choice depends on how long an artificial tree is used and how a real tree is disposed of. Both options have their environmental pros and cons, but the key is to minimize carbon emissions and waste by making sustainable choices.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com